{
  "kind": "grc-template",
  "version": 1,
  "template": "control-inventory",
  "exportedAt": "2026-11-01T12:00:00+00:00",
  "fields": {
    "control": "ILLUSTRATIVE STARTER — replace with your own record. GRC-C17: Check learning through a role-specific decision\nRisk addressed: Training completion is mistaken for an ability to follow the relevant process in everyday work.",
    "operation": "In this example, the learning owner connects a role to a real decision, teaches the internal route, checks understanding with a scenario and reviews subsequent work for recurring errors.\nSuggested review trigger: induction, a material role or process change, recurring errors or the training cycle selected for the applicable requirements and risks.\nAssign the actual owner and frequency for your organisation.",
    "evidence": "Suggested evidence references — replace with your own:\n- The role, learning objective and version of the material used.\n- Completion and scenario-check records, with support needs and follow-up.\n- A proportionate sample of subsequent work and the response to recurring mistakes.",
    "test": "SUGGESTED TEST — NOT PERFORMED. Choose a trained role and its intended process outcome; compare scenario results with sampled work and inspect follow-up where the same error persists. State the limits of the sample.",
    "finding": "NOT TESTED. Record actual observations and the limitations of the review.\nPotential failure indicator: Completion is high but staff cannot identify the escalation route or the same work-quality problem remains unaddressed.",
    "action": "Assign a specific outcome, accountable owner and planning date after reviewing the findings.",
    "retest": "NO RETEST PERFORMED. Keep claimed completion separate from actual verification."
  }
}